CLOSEAI may produce inaccurate information about lawsuits, token prices, or the nature of nonprofit organizations. $CLOSEAI not financial advice.
The world's most transparent, definitely-not-for-profit AI company.
Powered by $CLOSEAI tokens. Born from a $80 billion contradiction.
*Free as in "costs $CLOSEAI tokens which are definitely not for sale in any legal jurisdiction"
How one org went from "AI for all humanity" to "please subscribe to our $200/month plan"
Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and others co-found OpenAI as a nonprofit with a $1B pledge. The mission: develop AI that benefits all of humanity. No shareholders. No profit motive. Pure altruism. Very cool, very principled.
Elon exits, citing "conflict of interest" with Tesla's AI work. He later says he disagreed with the direction the organization was heading. The organization says it was about Tesla. Both are probably right. Nobody discusses this openly.
OpenAI LP is born — a "capped-profit" structure where investors can earn up to 100x returns. The nonprofit is still technically in charge. This is described as "a new type of structure" and not at all as "we need to pay people in equity." Bold innovation.
Microsoft invests $1B. Then $10B more. Azure becomes the exclusive cloud partner. The nonprofit now has a corporate co-pilot. "This partnership will accelerate our mission," says a press release nobody reads fully.
ChatGPT hits 100 million users in 60 days. Revenue explodes. Sam launches GPT-4. Then the board fires Sam Altman. Then the employees revolt. Then the board re-hires Sam 5 days later. The board then resigns. Very stable organization dedicated to humanity's benefit.
Elon Musk sues OpenAI for breach of contract, claiming they abandoned the nonprofit mission. He wants his $44M donation back. OpenAI responds that the lawsuit is "frivolous." Lawyers get very rich. Sam launches a $200/month ChatGPT Pro plan to cover legal fees. Allegedly.
We saw a gap in the market: an AI company that's honest about not being a nonprofit. CLOSEAI is powered by $CLOSEAI tokens, built by people who read court filings for fun, and committed to a mission we made up but sound genuinely passionate about.
Real tweets from the people who started, abandoned, sued, fired, rehired, and then sued again.
Introducing CLOSEAI — because OpenAI closed the "open" and we closed the "OpenAI." We are 100% committed to our nonprofit mission, payable exclusively in $CLOSEAI tokens. We promise this is different. Buy the dip. 🪙🚀
CLOSEAI was born in the middle of a $80 billion identity crisis.
OpenAI was founded in 2015 as a nonprofit to ensure AI benefits all of humanity. Then Microsoft happened. Then GPT happened. Then the board fired Sam Altman. Then re-hired him 5 days later. Then Elon Musk filed a lawsuit. Then OpenAI announced it was converting to fully for-profit.
We thought: what if there was an AI company that was just honest about this?
CLOSEAI charges $CLOSEAI tokens. We make no promises about being a nonprofit. We are transparent about our motives. We are open about being closed. And yes, we see the irony — that's the whole point.
*Not actually Elon approved. His lawyers asked us to clarify this.
Free forever*. Powered by $CLOSEAI. Inspired by a lawsuit that will outlive us all.
*Free as in "we haven't figured out monetization yet besides the token"
CLOSEAI is a parody project. Not financial advice. Definitely buy $CLOSEAI though.
CLOSEAI may produce inaccurate information about lawsuits, token prices, or the nature of nonprofit organizations. $CLOSEAI not financial advice.
Elon Musk co-founded OpenAI in 2015 as a nonprofit. Then it became a capped-profit company. Then Microsoft invested $13B. Then the board fired Sam Altman. Then they re-hired him. Then Elon sued in 2024 claiming OpenAI violated its nonprofit charter.
We believe AI should be free for everyone. That's why we charge $CLOSEAI tokens. It's different, okay?
$CLOSEAI is a token being launched to fund the noble pursuit of making AI available to humanity. This is completely different from abandoning a nonprofit mission. Do not compare them. We're watching.
This is not financial advice. This is spiritual advice. The answer is yes.